• CityBES
  • Start
  • Team
  • Lbnl
  • Citybes logo
  • Overview

  • Publications

  • Acknowledgment

  • Disclaimers

Overview

Buildings in cities consume 30 to 70% of the cities' total primary energy. Retrofitting the existing building stock to improve energy efficiency and reduce energy use and energy costs is a key strategy for cities to achieve their energy goals. Planning and evaluating retrofit strategies (energy efficiency, electrification) for buildings requires a deep understanding of the physical characteristics, operating patterns, and energy use of the building stock. This is a challenge for city managers as data and tools are limited and disparate.

CityBES is a web-based data and computing platform, focusing on energy modeling and analysis of a city's building stock to support district or city-scale efficiency programs. CityBES uses an international open data standard, CityGML, to represent and exchange 3D city models. CityBES employs EnergyPlus to simulate building energy use and savings from energy efficient retrofits. CityBES provides a suite of features for urban planners, city energy managers, building owners, utilities, energy consultants and researchers. CityBES won a 2022 R&D 100 Award. An overview video is available here. R&d 100

The following figure shows the three layers of the software architecture of CityBES: The Data layer, the Algorithms and Software layer, and the Use Cases layer. The Data layer includes the weather data, the 3D city model (CityGML or GeoJSON) created with multiple data sources such as GIS, land use, and assessor records; and database of energy efficiency measures, utility rates, and building energy codes and standards. The Software layer includes EnergyPlus as the simulation engine and CBES SDK which built upon OpenStudio. The Use Cases layer provides examples of applications, including energy benchmarking, energy retrofit analysis, district heating and cooling system modeling, renewable energy analysis, building performance visualization, heat resilience modeling, as well as urban scale mapping of microclimate and heat vulnerability at census tract level.

Citybes software architecture
CityBES also generates load profiles for buildings in an urban district, using the USDOE Commercial Prototype Building Models and the and the Commercial Reference Buildings. The load profiles include cooling loads, heating loads, domestic hot water loads, and electrical loads for fans and pumps. The load profiles can be used in sizing and simulation of performance of district heating and cooling systems.

Publications

  • W. Zhang, K. Sun, H. Li, L. Rodriguez-Garcia, M. Heleno, T. Hong. Calibration of Urban Building Energy Model Using Smart Meter Data for District Peak Load Prediction. Applied Energy, 2026.
  • Z. Deng, Y. Xu, T. Hong. Quantum Computing Approach for Building Surface Sunlit in Urban-scale Energy Modeling. Energy and Buildings, 2025.
  • Y. Xu, W. Zhang, M. Wei, T. Hong. Mapping Heat Vulnerability in Cities: A Tale of Two California Cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2025.
  • T. Hong, J. Malik, D. Yan, Z. Liu, J. Langevin. Ten Questions on Building Stock Modeling to Inform Energy Efficiency and Sustainability. Building and Environment. 2025.
  • T. Hong, S.H. Lee, W. Zhang, H. Li, K. Sun, J. Kace. Informing Electrification Strategies of Residential Neighborhoods with Urban Building Energy Modeling. Building Simulation, 2024.
  • R. Lopez, T. Hong, M.C. Martinez. Optimizing urban housing design: improving thermo-energy performance and mitigating heat emissions from buildings – a Latin American case study. Urban Climate, 2024.
  • Y. Xu, P. Vahmani, A. Jones, T. Hong. Anthropogenic Heat from Buildings in Los Angeles County: A simulation framework and assessment. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2024.
  • S.H. Lee, T. Hong, M. Le, L. Medina, Y. Xu, A. Robinson, M.A. Piette. Assessment of Energy and Thermal Resilience Performance to Inform Climate Mitigation of Multifamily Buildings in Disadvantaged Communities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2024.
  • S. Haddad, W. Zhang, R. Paolini, K. Gao, M. Altheeb, A. Al Mogirah, A. BinMoammar, T. Hong, A. Khan, C. Cartalis, A. Polydorose and M. Santamouris. Quantifying the Energy Impact of Heat Mitigation Technologies at the Urban Scale. Nature Cities. 2024.
  • T. Hong, S.H. Lee, W. Zhang, K. Sun, B. Hooper, J. Kim. Nexus of Electrification and Energy Efficiency Retrofit of Commercial Buildings at the District Scale. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2023.
  • N. Luo, X. Luo, M. Mortezazadeh, M. Albettar, W. Zhang, D. Zhan, L. Wang, and T. Hong. A data schema for exchanging information between urban building energy models and urban microclimate models in coupled simulations. Building Performance Simulation, 2022.
  • K. Sun, P. Kusumah, W. Zhang, M. Wei, T. Hong. Exploring Decarbonization and Clean Energy Pathways for Disadvantaged Communities in California. International COBEE Conference, Montreal, Canada, 2022.
  • L. Teso, L. Carnieletto, K. Sun, W. Zhang, A. Gasparella, P. Romagnoni, A. Zarrella, T. Hong. Large scale energy analysis and renovation strategies for social housing in the historic city of Venice. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 2022.
  • P. Vahmani, X. Luo, A. Jones, T. Hong. Anthropogenic heating of the urban environment: an investigation of feedback dynamics between urban micro-climate and decomposed anthropogenic heating from buildings. Building and Environment, 2022.
  • Z. Zeng, W. Zhang, K. Sun, M. Wei, T. Hong. Investigation of pre-cooling as a recommended measure to improve residential buildings’ thermal resilience during heat waves. Building and Environment, 2021.
  • L. Carnieletto, M. Ferrando, L. Teso, K. Sun, W. Zhang, F. Causone, P. Romagnoni, A. Zarrella, T. Hong. Italian Prototype Building Models for Urban Scale Building Performance Simulation. Building and Environment, 2021.
  • X. Luo, P. Vahmani, T. Hong, A. Jones. City-scale building anthropogenic heating during heat waves. Atmosphere, 2020.
  • K. Sun, W. Zhang, Z. Zeng, R. Levinson, M. Wei, T. Hong. Passive cooling designs to improve heat resilience of homes in underserved and vulnerable communities. Energy and Buildings, 2021.
  • T. Hong, Y. Xu, K. Sun, W. Zhang, X. Luo, B. Hooper. Urban Microclimate and Its Impact on Building Performance: A Case Study of San Francisco. Urban Climate, 2021.
  • L. Carnieletto, M. Ferrando, L. Teso, K. Sun, W. Zhang, F. Causone, P. Romagnoni, A. Zarrella, T. Hong. Italian Prototype Building Models for Urban Scale Building Performance Simulation. Building and Environment, 2021.
  • Y. Xu, T. Hong, W. Zhang, Z. Zeng, M. Wei. Heat Vulnerability Index Development and Mapping. SimAUD Conference 2021.
  • H. Li, T. Hong, Z. Wang. Modelling and Simulation of District Heating and Cooling Systems Using CityBES. IBPSA Building Simulation Conference, 2021.
  • Y. Chen, Z. Deng, X. Guo, T. Hong. Automatic and Rapid Calibration of Urban Building Energy Models by Learning from Energy Performance Database. Applied Energy, 2020.
  • T. Hong, M. Ferrando, X. Luo, F. Causone. Modeling and Analysis of Heat Emissions from Buildings to Ambient Air. Applied Energy, 2020.
  • M. Ferrando, F. Causone, T. Hong, Y. Chen. Urban Building Energy Modeling (UBEM) Tools: A State-of-the-Art Review of bottom-up physics-based approaches. Sustainable Cities and Society, 2020.  
  • X. Luo, T. Hong, Y.H. Tang. Modeling thermal interactions between buildings in an urban context. Energies, 2020.
  • K. Sun, M. Specian, T. Hong. Nexus of Thermal Resilience and Energy Efficiency in Buildings: A case study of a nursing home. Building and Environment, 2020.
  • A.T.D. Perera, V.M. Nik, D. Chen, J.L. Scartezzini, T. Hong. Quantifying the impacts of climate change and extreme climate events on energy systems. Nature Energy, 2020.
  • T. Hong, Y. Chen, X. Luo, N. Luo, S.H. Lee. Ten questions on urban building energy modeling. Building and Environment, 2020.
  • Y. Chen, T. Hong, X. Luo, B. Hooper. Development of City Buildings Dataset for Urban Building Energy Modeling. Energy and Buildings, 2018.
  • R. Jain, X. Luo, G. Sever, T. Hong, C. Catlett. Representation and evolution of urban weather boundary conditions in Downtown Chicago. Building Performance Simulation, 2018.
  • T. Hong, Y. Chen, M.A. Piette, X. Luo. Modeling City Building Stock for Large Scale Energy Efficiency Improvement using CityBES. ACEEE Summer Study in Building Energy Efficiency, 2018.
  • X. Luo, T. Hong. Modeling building energy performance in urban context. ASHRAE BPAC / SimBuild Conference, Chicago, 2018.
  • Y. Chen, T. Hong. Impacts of Building Geometry Modeling Methods on the Simulation Results of Urban Building Energy Models. Applied Energy, 2018.
  • Y. Chen, T. Hong, M.A. Piette (2017). Automatic generation and simulation of urban building energy models based on city datasets for city-scale building retrofit analysis. Applied Energy, 2017.
  • T. Hong, Y. Chen, S.H. Lee, M.A. Piette. CityBES: A Web-based Platform to Support City-Scale Building Energy Efficiency. Urban Computing, 2016.
  • Y. Chen, T. Hong, M.A. Piette. City-Scale Building Retrofit Analysis: A Case Study using CityBES. Building Simulation, 2017.

Acknowledgment

CityBES was sponsored by Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, under the Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) Program. CityBES benefited from the customer discovery and market analysis under the Energy I-Corps Cohort 12 sponsored by U.S. Department of Energy in Spring 2021. The heat resilience modeling feature and heat vulnerability mapping feature were developed with support from a California Strategic Growth Council project, Cal-THRIVES, led by Dr. Max Wei of LBNL. The single and multi-family modeling feature was developed with support from a California Energy Commission project, Building Healthier and More Energy-Efficient Communities in Fresno and the Central Valley, led by Dr. Max Wei. The Italian prototype building models were jointly developed by LBNL and four Italian universities: Universita di Padova, Politecnico di Milano, Libera Universita di Bolzano, and Universita Iuav di Venezia.

Disclaimers

This website and related content were prepared as an account of or to expedite work sponsored at least in part by the United States Government. While we strive to provide correct information, neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor The Regents of the University of California, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights.

Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by its trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof, or The Regents of the University of California. Use of the Laboratory or University’s name for endorsements is prohibited.

The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof or The Regents of the University of California. Neither Berkeley Lab nor its employees are agents of the US Government.

Berkeley Lab web pages link to many other websites. Such links do not constitute an endorsement of the content or company and we are not responsible for the content of such links.

More information is available here.

Sign in with your CityBES account

Forgot Password?
Can't find your project. Please restart your browser.
Can't find your project. Please restart your browser.
Can't find your project. Please restart your browser.
Can't find your project. Please restart your browser.

District Heating and Cooling System


  • Introduction
  • Load Profile
  • Describe Systems and Simulate
  • Results

Introduction

This feature imports and visualizes a cooling and heating load profile of a district of buildings, then users select a few district energy system types and specify their characteristics for evaluation, next EnergyPlus models are created and simulations are run to calculate the energy use and energy cost of the selected district energy systems, and finally simulation results are shown for users to compare performance between the selected district energy systems.

A load profile is a csv file with 8760 hourly values of the district’s heating demand (W), cooling demand (W), and the electricity consumption (kWh) and natural gas consumption (MMBTU) associated with the cooling and heating demands.

Currently, five types of district energy systems are supported, including water-cooled chillers and boilers, water-cooled chillers with ice-storage and boilers, heat-recovery chillers and heat pumps, and geothermal heat pump. Future system types will include CHP.

Load Profile

Download this template and provide your own district heating and cooling demand profile.

Or simply click on "Upload" to explore the feature with sample load profiles.


Describe Systems and Simulate

Please upload heating and cooling load profiles first.

Results

No simulation results yet.



Can't find your project. Please restart your browser.
Can't find your project. Please restart your browser.
Can't find your project. Please restart your browser.
CityBES is developed by a team led by Dr. Tianzhen Hong in Building Technology and Urban Systems Division of LBNL. Team members include:

Tianzhen Hong (PI, thong@lbl.gov)
Yilin Jiang (Developer, CBES and Support, jiangyilin5653@lbl.gov)
Kaiyu Sun (Developer, CBES and Support)
Han Li (Developer, District Energy System module)
Yujie Xu (Developer, Urban Microclimate and Heat Vulnerability mapping modules, Dataset Development)
Mary Ann Piette (Senior Advisor)
Wanni Zhang (Former LBNL Developer)
Xuan Luo (Dataset and Support, former LBNL)
Yixing Chen (Former LBNL Developer)
Daryn Lee (Former Student Intern, Dataset Development)
Please fill in the Google form below for permission request. Please fill in the Google form below for technical support.

Notes for Building Dataset Management

The code list (case insensitive) for building types are as follows. The size of the building is calculated based on the building footprint and the number of stories. All other codes are currently treated as "Others" building type, but the original labels in your dataset will be recorded in our database. Once we can handle those building types in CityBES, the data can be processed again to further assign the building type for those buildings.
  • Office: office, 211, 212, 500, b, bz, o, oa, oah, oal, oam, oat, obh, obl, obm, oc, och, ocl, ocm, omd, oz
  • Retail: retail, 202, 206, 208, 209, c, c1, cz, rh1, s,
  • Restaurant: restaurant, 201
  • Hotel: hotel, h, h1, h2, hc, m, 110
  • Single Family House: 101, d, cos, dbm, th, thbm, single family, single-family, residential-single family, single-family building, single family building, single-family house, single family house
  • Multi Family House: 102, 104, 103, z, ZBM, ZEU, da, da15, da5, a, a15, a5, co, f, f15, f5, ti15, tia, tic, tic5, tif, multi family, multi-family, residential-multi family, multi-family building, multi family building, multi-family house, multi family house

For Coordinate Reference System (CRS) or Spatial Reference System (SRS), please convert your dataset to use one of the following CRS/SRS system. You can use QGIS (http://www.qgis.org), a free and open source geographic information system tool, to do the conversion.
  • EPSG:2227 for San Francisco, CA
  • EPSG:2229 for Los Angeles, CA
  • EPSG:32118 for New York City, NY
  • EPSG:2992 for Portland, OR
  • EPSG:2253 for Chicago, IL

The Unique index is used to sort (smallest to largest) the Building Dataset list in the Start tab.
The Unique building dataset name is used in the Building Dataset list in the Start tab.
The User-defined building id filed is for user to identify the buildings they upload in the results downloaded. It has to be unique in each dataset.

The Minimum longitude, Maximum longitude, Minimum latitude, and Maximum latitude are used to create a boundary. Only the buildings inside the boundary are added to the dataset. This is optional.


Time resolution

Aggregation method

Select time range

Start
End

Value at

A B

Distribution of points on the time-series

Zoomed in view of the time series

Credit: source for local weather data from White Box Technologies, provided by SF DOE
×

Introduction to the interface

The interface has 9 major components, as is shown in the following figure

  1. A main map display of a heat map of one of the raw (dry bulb temperature, relative humidity, solar radiation, and wind speed) or derived (heat index, heating degree day or HDD, cooling degree day or CDD, urban heat island index or UHII) weather variables
  2. A time-series view showing the spatial-temporal aggregation (the solid line) and the spatial extremes (the min and max of the color-coded values displayed on the map, shown with two dashed lines) of the temporal aggregation of the selected variable
  3. A time slider navigating through all time steps between the "start" and "end" dates specified in the time selector (component 8)
  4. A zoomed in view of the time series plot within 3 time steps from the current time stamp
  5. A distribution plot (histogram) of the spatial-temporal aggregation for the time range specified in the time selector, i.e. the distribution of the points on the solid line in the time-series view
  6. A numeric display of the spatial-temporal aggregation at the current time step
  7. A resolution and aggregation selector, specifying the temporal resolution of the display and how the weather station data is aggregated in the time dimension. For example, when the “year” resolution and the “mean” aggregation method are chosen, annual average data of each weather station (marked with white labels on the map) is computed and used to calculate a spatial interpolation of the whole San Francisco area for each year. The spatial average of values at all pixels on the map (for the chosen time resolution and aggregation method in component 7) are computed and displayed in the numeric display (component 6) and the time-series view (component 2) as points on the solid line. The spatial min and max of all the pixels on the map are displayed as points on the dashed lines in the time-series view. No aggregation method is available for the hourly data, as our source data is hourly. HDD and CDD only have three time resolutions (year, month, and day), because of the way they are defined
  8. A time selector specifying the range of time period displayed in the time series view (component 2) and the end points of the time slider (component 3)
  9. Weather variables for selection: dry bulb temperature, relative humidity, solar radiation, wind speed, heat index, HDD, CDD, UHII

Variable definition and how they are calculated

  • Solar Radiation: it refers to the Global Horizontal Radiation in Wh/m2
  • Heat Index: it is “a measure of how hot it really feels when relative humidity is factored in with the actual air temperature” (US Department of Commerce, 2018). The heat index calculation follows (NOAA/ National Weather Service, 2014)
  • Heating Degree Day (HDD) and Cooling Degree Day (CDD): first a daily mean temperature (the average of the daily max and the daily min) is computed, if the daily mean is above some base temperature (50F in our calculation), then the difference between the daily mean and the base temperature is the cooling degree day for that day; if the daily mean is below the base temperature 65F, the difference between the daily mean and the base temperature is the heating degree day of that day. The heating or cooling degree day for a month or a year is just the total heating or cooling degree day for all days in that month or year
  • Urban Heat Island Index (UHII): it is a modification of the UHII metric in (Dean, 2015). The following method is used to compute the urban heat island index of pixel p for duration \(\text{UHII}_{pD}\)

    $$\text{UHII}_{pD} = \sum_{h \in D} \mathbb{I}[\text{Urban(p)}] \cdot (\max(0, T_{ph} - \overline{T_{uh}}))$$

    where \(\mathbb{I}[\text{Urban}(p)]\) is an indicator of whether pixel p is of an urban land use type, and \(\overline{T_{uh}}\) is the average temperature of all un-urban pixels in San Francisco.

Select a city:
Exposure

Overheat Days

Longest Overheat-day Streak

High HI Hours

PM2.5 Concentration

Ozone Exceedance

×

Introduction

Extreme heat is one of the leading causes of weather-related deaths. It leads to an average of 658 deaths per year (CDC, 2017). Climate change could make heat wave more frequent, more severe, and longer lasting, causing more deaths (IPCC 2007). By late-century (2071–2100), the average temperature of continental US could increase by approximately 5.0°F (2.8°C) for RCP4.5 and 8.7°F (4.8°C) for RCP8.5, relative to 1976–2005. The figure on the right is from (Hsiang et al., 2017). It projected as high as 80% increase in all-cause deaths by the end of the century.

A heat vulnerability index map could highlight sub-groups / regions susceptible to heat induced damages, so that necessary interventions or infrastructure could be prepared ahead of time. It could also assist the planning of emergency responses to improve the resilience to extreme heat events.

To evaluate the vulnerability to extreme heat, three separate HVI sub-indices are constructed: exposure, sensitivity, and adaptation. Exposure reflects the severity of the problem. Currently it includes five outdoor exposure factors: two temperature derived heatwave characteristics, heat index, and two air quality variables. An indoor building heat resistance indicator that characterizes the indoor heat level will be added in the next version. Sensitivity factors identify sub-groups who are more susceptible to severe damages than general public under similar heat exposure. Elderly or children, education, race, poverty, and pre-existing condition fall into this category. The third factor is adaptation, including factors that modifies the response to extreme heat. Income and the availability of green space are in this category.

The overall HVI is an aggregation of the three sub-indices: Exposure * Sensitivity / Adaptation

Data source

The following table shows the data sources.

Factor Variable Definition Source
Exposure Overheat days Number of overheat days (daily maximum temperature above 30°C, and daily minimum temperature above 22°C) Derived from hourly temperature from weather underground (WeatherHistory & Data Archive, 2020)
Longest overheat-day streak Number of consecutive overheat days
Hours with dangerous Heat Index (HI) Number of hours with heat index in range of "danger" or "extreme danger" Derived with hourly temperature, and RH, from weather underground (WeatherHistory & Data Archive, 2020)
pm2.5 concentration Annual mean concentration in ug/m3 California Heat Assessment Tool (Four Twenty Seven, 2018)
Ozone exceedance Ozone exceeding state standard
Building heat resistance indicator   Developed for the project using building simulation data
Sensitivity percent elderly percent of populaiton over 65 American Community Survey - 5-year estimate, 2013 – 2017 (U.S. Census Bureau, 2017)
percent children percent of population under 5
percent non-white Percent of non-white population 
percent poverty Percent of population below poverty level threshold
percent low-education percent of population without a high school degree
percent with cognitive disability Percent of population with “serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.” (U.S. Census Bureau, 2018)
percent with ambulatory disability Percent of population with “serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.” (U.S. Census Bureau, 2018)
Asthma prevalence Asthma hospitalization rate per 10,000 people California Heat Assessment Tool (Four Twenty Seven, 2018)
Heart attack prevalence Heart attack rate per 1,000 people
Adaptation median income   American Community Survey - 5-year estimate, 2013 – 2017 (U.S. Census Bureau, 2017)
parks Percent of the census tract area covered in parks City of Fresno GIS Data Hub (City of Fresno, 2020)

Interface

The HVI web map consists of three separate HVI sub-index views. The three sub-index views can be toggled using Component 1 in the following diagram. In each sub-index map view, the corresponding HVI sub-index is shown on the left (Component 2), and a various number of factor map views are shown on the right (Component 4). Each factor map view shows an ordinal of 1-5, indicating the severity of the corresponding variable. The HVI sub-index is produced with a weighted average of the factor views for each census tract. The weights of each factor could be adjusted with Component 6. User will need to enter a non-negative value in Component 6. The values will be normalized to produce the weights.

Fresno HVI interface

References

  1. CDC. (2017). Heat-related illness. https://www.cdc.gov/pictureofamerica/pdfs/Picture_of_America_Heat-Related_Illness.pdf
  2. City of Fresno. (2020). City of Fresno Data Hub. https://gis-cityoffresno.hub.arcgis.com/
  3. Four Twenty Seven. (2018). The California Heat Assessment Tool: Planning for the Health Impacts of Extreme Heat. http://427mt.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/427-CHAT-report.pdf
  4. Hsiang, S., Kopp, R., Jina, A., Rising, J., Delgado, M., Mohan, S., Rasmussen, D. J., Muir-Wood, R., Wilson, P., Oppenheimer, M., Larsen, K., & Houser, T. (2017). Estimating economic damage from climate change in the United States. Science, 356(6345), 1362–1369. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal4369
  5. U.S. Census Bureau. (2017). 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates.
  6. U.S. Census Bureau. (2018). American Community Survey and Puerto Rico Community Survey 2018 Subject Definitions.
  7. Weather History & Data Archive. (2020, August). Weather Underground. https://www.wunderground.com/history

Time resolution

Aggregation method

Select time range

Start
End

Median value of the district at

A kW

Distribution of points on the time-series

Zoomed in view of the time series

×

Introduction to the interface

The interface has 9 major components, as is shown in the following figure

  1. A main map display of an energy consumption map of the variables (Total site energy, Electricity, Gas, Electricity demand)
  2. A time-series view showing the spatial-temporal aggregation (the solid line) and the spatial extremes (the 25% and 75% quartiles of the color-coded values displayed on the map, shown with two dashed lines) of the temporal aggregation of the selected variable
  3. A time slider navigating through all time steps between the “start” and “end” dates specified in the time selector (component 8)
  4. A zoomed in view of the time series plot within 3 time steps from the current time stamp
  5. A distribution plot (histogram) of the spatial-temporal aggregation for the time range specified in the time selector, i.e. the distribution of the points on the solid line in the time-series view
  6. A numeric display of the spatial-temporal aggregation at the current time step
  7. A time selector specifying the range of time period displayed in the time series view (component 2) and the end points of the time slider (component 3)
  8. A resolution and aggregation selector to select the resolution and aggregation method for displaying energy data over time. This determines how the data is grouped and presented in the temporal dimension. The aggregation methods are summarized in the table below.

    Category Unit Aggregation method
    Total site energy MJ sum
    Electricity consumption MJ sum
    Gas consumption MJ sum
    Electricity demand kW min, mean, peak

    For instance, if the user selects a "month" resolution and the "mean" aggregation method, the average energy data for each month is calculated by considering all census tracks. These monthly averages are then used to generate a spatial interpolation for the entire Los Angeles area. In the selected resolution and aggregation method (specified in component 8), the numeric display (component 6) and the time-series view (component 2) represent the computed spatial averages of values from all census tracks as points on a solid line. In the time-series view, the dashed lines represent the 25th and 75th percentile values derived from the energy data of all census tracks on the map. These percentile values provide a visual representation of the distribution of energy data across the various locations within the map.
    N.B. Yearly and hourly data does not have an available aggregation method, as the source data spans one year and is provided on an hourly basis.
  9. Variables to display: Total site energy, Electricity Consumption, Gas Consumption, Electricity demand

Time resolution

Aggregation method

Select time range

Start
End

Median value of the district at

A J

Distribution of points on the time-series

Zoomed in view of the time series

×

Introduction to the interface

The interface has 9 major components, as is shown in the following figure

  1. A main map display of an anthropogenic heat emission map of the variables (Total heat emission, HVAC heat emission)
  2. A time-series view showing the spatial-temporal aggregation (the solid line) and the spatial extremes (the 25% and 75% quartiles of the color-coded values displayed on the map, shown with two dashed lines) of the temporal aggregation of the selected variable
  3. A time slider navigating through all time steps between the “start” and “end” dates specified in the time selector (component 8)
  4. A zoomed in view of the time series plot within 3 time steps from the current time stamp
  5. A distribution plot (histogram) of the spatial-temporal aggregation for the time range specified in the time selector, i.e. the distribution of the points on the solid line in the time-series view
  6. A numeric display of the spatial-temporal aggregation at the current time step
  7. A time selector specifying the range of time period displayed in the time series view (component 2) and the end points of the time slider (component 3)
  8. A resolution and aggregation selector to select the resolution and aggregation method for displaying energy data over time. This determines how the data is grouped and presented in the temporal dimension. The aggregation methods are summarized in the table below.

    Category Unit Aggregation method
    Total Anthropogenic Heat Emission MJ min, mean, peak, sum
    HVAC Heat Emission MJ min, mean, peak, sum

    For instance, if the user chooses a "month" resolution and selects the "mean" aggregation method, the average anthropogenic heat data for each month is calculated by considering all census tracks. These monthly averages are then used to generate a spatial interpolation for the entire Los Angeles area. In the selected resolution and aggregation method (specified in component 8), the numeric display (component 6) and the time-series view (component 2) represent the computed spatial averages of values from all census tracks as points on a solid line. In the time-series view, the dashed lines represent the 25th and 75th percentile values derived from the heat emission data of all census tracks on the map. These percentile values provide a visual representation of the distribution of heat emission data across the various locations within the map.
    N.B. Yearly and hourly data does not have an available aggregation method, as the source data spans one year and is provided on an hourly basis.
  9. Variables to display: Total heat emission, HVAC heat emission
Can't find your project. Please restart your browser.